Well the first problem with this non scientific hypothesis that everything in the universe can be reduced is that it doesn’t have predictive power, or at least it certainly has Newtonian predictive power, and relativistic predictive power, and even very precise predictive powers at the quantum level- yet all of those predictive powers, reduced , cannot seem to account for the motion of galaxies and hence the dark matter and dark energy “concern”.

Additionally, reductionism has utterly failed to produce a scientific theory of mind.

So please, no long logically contradictory reasonings on why the reductive view is the superior view; show the scientific theories for mind, emergence, dark matter or at least a coherent argument for it without making any blaring philosophical contradictions.

I will be on standby ! 😀