Sincere question on this. I have a hard time with classifying pre-scientific systems as “pseudoscience” in their own indigenous and natural form. This is not to say that someone for example could be pseudoscientific in their application. I find this to be more of a bias therefore and less of a classification when the word is used. This is for me one of the more intriguing areas in the philosophy of science so consider me a new follower if this area is your speciality.