Lovely article! A very rational and seamless flow of reasoning unattached to outcome. I suppose we will always be left with mystery, yet we will always have a pathway to know for certain “some but not all” things via science and imagine the rest (art) however we need to adjust the difference.

I think in a way that is what you are suggesting? It’s not a failure of science, it’s just an invitation with philosophy (as well as art) to catch up. We will always have some sort of unknowable transcendent which will always appear to be “outside” of the system. All science or all art will likely be disappointing but maybe if the two can tango ?