If that’s true then it means knowledge or understanding of human nature could not be contained within science at all. If all science can do is describe what is “really” and “actually” happening, and from that view our own minds and mental viewpoints are non existent, then it means psychology is the embodiment of the unreal, impervious to the scientific method.


I mean, that’s kinda far out if you consider after science meets the boundary the only thing we have to ponder that is stranger than reality is the unreal reality.

That’s not science explaining away mind, it’s science acknowledging a fair boundary.