Hi adrien thanks for the follow up, I’m glad your question was not just rhetorical and if it is a genuine question, I do have a genuine and clear answer. My answer is so clear that the reason why I’ve yet to construct the article promised you is we are in the midst of launching a demonstration of the very principle I believe addresses your question.

So please forgive my short answer for the comment section.

It’s really simple to define what web3 is and I’m not sure why it’s a struggle for anyone. Web3 is an activation of a design principle and I think that people confuse the design principles at play with the mediums that are being used to express the principles, thus causing confusion.

One sentence, you ready? Web3 is win-win distribution.

Mutual trust is distributed through smart contracts and digital wallets.

Web3 scaling the trust factor, it’s a social phenomenon that has a distribution pathway where previously it didn’t. “Decentralization” is just one possible pathway. Web3 is really more about recentralization, meaning that what was previously a bureaucracy is deconstructed down to essential administrative functions which can be programmed into a smart contract which can allow an “adhocracy” to form on top of it.

Anything that can be applied into a smart contract can get whipped into this frenzy, art, finance, governance.

That’s my short answer.

Longer answer is spread across bigmotherdao.com and we are very shortly launching a new type of compliant web 3 studio fund using NFTs, all demonstrating and piloting Bucky fullers design principles in economic systems.

To understand Bucky is to understand the potential of web3 and a lot of people intuitively instinct this but things are so new and we live in a sea of misinformation so lots of confusion at this stage is natural I believe.

Anyway, thx for giving me opportunity to clarify my own thinking on the subject and I enjoy your articles. Cheers