Steve Bannon himself willfully practices both deception and division as a strategy.
I'm sorry, I find it to be a great farce; to believe that an "awakened" mind must rely on deception and division!
I don't see how "awakening" can mean being utterly confused.
if you're awakened state means that we need to be surrounded by shit all the time, I question that you are awakened at all.
To me, you just look like a mind that has been weaponized, frothing with contradictions and confusion, and willing to bath in shit everyday just to prove your point.
Freedom of speech is not freedom of reach. Please stop confusing the two in your mind. What you are proposing actually LIMITS rational discourse and makes it impossible!
So your version of "freedom of speech" actually winds up censoring "rational discourse".
And all because you simply can't envision anything better than web 2.0, oye.
This is not any legal or constitutional right, the consitution is about freedom of political speech.
For example, just because you can say "shit, piss, cum and shit" all you want, the FTC regulates that speech away from public broadcast airwaves.
Distribution is not "so-called", distribution of speech is literally NOT the same as speech itself.
You are clearly, clearly, clearly confusing the right of political speech as the right to have all speech distributed equally, which is truly just an irrational idea.
Well, the individuals involved inside of the consensus process itself get to define what "rational" means.
In the methodology of non-dual consensus, "rational" is defined first as simply being honest. For example, if someone is to acknowledge they made a mistake, or do not know an answer; this is evidence of "rational" thinking.
Secondly, "rational" is defined like it is defined in economics, which is the ability to communicate what is in your own best interests without making a contradiction.
Thirdly, "rational" is defined by the ability to perceive and communicate what is in your best interests as well as the interests of those you are building a consensus process.
Over-politicized thinking is not your friend, and, thus "irrational" to use in consensus building!