1. I’m going to have to be a bit more confrontational with you, because to me your entire commentary is simply applying magical thinking.

For example, you claim that I am the master of “flawed logic” yet logic, if flawed, produces contradictions.

You cannot waive away contradictions by simply stating your belief system.

Just because you believe this is flawed logic, does not make this flawed logic.

What makes this flawed logic is if I have a contradiction that I cannot account for, and you can.

Bannon is a disinformation agent, and as our community addresses online misinformation, disinformation with ten years of research, I can assure you I am not “triggered” by Bannon, I can “explain” Bannon and I can show is vast contradictions.

2. I think you were a fool to invoke Bannon, but lets see how well you do with it.

3. So you admit you’re just trying to trigger me? For what purpose does that solve?

4. Yes Google search can also be a shit show.

5. Practicing “what about THEM” when Bannon is mentioned in the topic informs me that you are not approaching this conversation rationally.

6. The practice of deception or manipulation is human nature.

7. The practice of “whataboutism” is manipulation.

Yawn.

8. Nothing new re: media and power structure co-ordination.

9. None of that justifies Bannon.

10. They are all assholes.

11. “Rational discourse” is decided by those engaged in the discourse.

12. Indeed, “knowing the enemy” is quite important. Turning everyone who disagrees with you into the enemy, however, is delusion, utter delusion.

13. When I say that “freedom of speech” as applied in modern vernacular and practice (ex: Twitter or social media) restricts freedom of rational discourse that is based on research, not being “triggered by Bannon”

14. Show me the “rational discourse” happening in just ONE Bannon video, please.

15.) I can disprove you because you are making contractions and inaccurate statements about censorship, logic, and free speech.

16.) Says formalization, testing, piloting, and research. You are welcome to try to game the process in the live demonstration https://bigmotherdao.com/dao-governance/

17. My algorithm does not require that you believe in it. I have already received high level endorsements in law, computer science, governance and journalism. The algorithm is falsifiable.

18. You can try to do the ol Bannon “magical thinking” and just say what you wish or hope to be true, but I don’t care. What I talk about is falsifiable.

19. The contradictions you are making have been twofold...

You assume that my position is “pro-censorship”, which I provided contrary evidence to, Aiki Wiki.

You're applying a legal and constitutional argument (freedom of speech) in such a manner that actually restricts freedom of speech.

“Freedom of Reach” refers to distribution, not speech itself.

Because you cannot make a distinction between speech and the distribution of speech, you will likely continue to make numerous contradictions.

I’m still waiting for these “facts about reality” that you claim you have given me that I have not already accounted for.

The medium article is just an article; whitepapers are here https://bigmotherdao.com/whitepapers/